On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:43:06PM +0300, Elmo Todurov wrote: > On 05/19/2010 01:32 PM, pancake wrote: > >i would probably even improve the heap usage of this .c, but it's > >better solution than the shellscript one IMHO. > > How? I believe usability is a factor as important as general sucklessness. If the shell script version is annoyingly slow, and there is a comparatively simple .c version that's much faster, I'd go for the .c version... regardless of religious issues (although if the faster version was 5000 lines of c++, I'd think twice about it)
Regards, Mate
