On 12 October 2010 20:58, Wolf Tivy <wti...@my.bcit.ca> wrote: >>I've managed to make it compile a good chunk of the object files, >>but not malloc/free so its somewhat wasted. > > It'll talk eventually, keep up the pressure. > >> When I get a chance to go at it again I believe the android distribution >>has some "clean" kernel headers included. I may try to move those to >>wherever its looking now. > > Yes it does, in fact I think it shouldn't need any system headers at all, > if you point it to the paths in OVERVIEW.TXT. Is there some > "include_path" environment variable you can set, or do we have to hack > the jamfile? Or we could do it your way and move them. Worst case is a new > makefile.
there's a variable in the Jamfile INCLUDES_x86, the included header files dont seem to do the trick though. Running into syntax errors. > Surely someone else must have dealt with this. Metasploit has been mentioned > a few times, but I couldn't find any thing more than the blog post > (issue report, whatever) that jens linked. Anyone have a link to more info? > > About uClibc, it's LGPL, so isn't static linking a bit marginal? For > GPL-compatible stuff it's ok, but 9base is incompatible, so it may actually > need to be ported to bionic. Have I got this right? > >
