Debian, every time. Now is a good time since they just released a new "stable". Last stable I installed took 10MB of memory with a normal non-gui boot, with bash loaded up and everything. Good enough for me.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Sean Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > I use OpenBSD. It can grow quickly if you want it to, and it can be > run on a VAX if you want it to. > > What performance need do you have that makes OpenBSD not worth it? > > When I am going to be throwing a system together without OpenBSD then > I tend to use Debian. > > --Sean > > On 11 February 2011 13:34, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've started these days to use wmii on ubuntu, previously I was using >> cwm on openbsd,but for some technical reason (smp, & performance need) >> I need to choose another OS. I would like to use this weekend to >> rethink my system and remove most of the tools i don't need but I'm >> undecided. What would you choose for a really minimal OS? >> >> In my min come netbsd, debian, minimal ubuntu, freebsd? I'm curious to >> know what you are using? >> >> - benoît >> >> > >
