It is possible.. But i do t think it takes much sense. Mach/darwin is just slow and bloat architecture. I would jst prefer netbsd or openbsd.. Or archlinux.
Btw. I think tht nexy port of dwm must be wayland. Somebody did any test with it? On 18/03/2011, at 17:51, Josh Rickmar <joshua_rick...@eumx.net> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:23:24AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> at work I have to use OSX (on a MacBook Pro 13") for various reasons >> and wonder if anyone is using dwm in conjunction with OSX? >> I tried different approaches so far, but all are really PITA. >> The only approach I can envision is running arch in VirtualBox and >> having a saner Linux environment to work with. But I have no idea what >> performance penalty that will be in regular use. >> >> At home I tend to leave the OSX machine untouched these days though. >> But using the braindamaged OSX UI feels more and more totally in the >> way and ineffecient. >> >> Any recommendations you'd like to share? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Anselm >> >> PS: Those of you who are tempted to say, drop this shit altogether and >> simply don't cope -- I can understand you and I agree to some degree, >> but I really wonder if there are people out there that do cope indeed >> and possibly would benefit from some improvements to dwm or so... >> > > Would it be possible/make sense to use something like PureDarwin > instead of OS X? >
