On 6 May 2011 02:46, Kurt H Maier <karmaf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Al Gest <himse...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Who's likely to behave more intelligently, a person who experiments >> and finds out what works and doesn't work for themselves and >> understands from experience why things work or don't work, or a person >> who religiously follows the preaching of some overcompensating >> jackass? > > Specious question. >
Evasive answer. > "Why" has been explained many times in the past on this very list. That doesn't provide any substance or merit to your belligerence. Vitriol has also been seethed many times in the past on this very list. You seem perfectly happy to provide redundant vitriol, so why not provide the allegedly redundant 'why' as well?
