Yeah, my poor English. There are always many stuffs in a language interpreter/compiler. The motivation of the project is to provide a minimal script environment inside other projects.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Pierre Chapuis <catw...@archlinux.us> wrote: > It's a detail, but shouldn't simple_interrupter.c be called > simple_interpreter.c instead? > > Otherwise, I haven't spent so much time looking at it but > the code looks pretty readable. The number of LOCs is > artificially high because of the C coding style, but the > complexity is low. > >
