On 4 November 2011 11:50, Connor Lane Smith <c...@lubutu.com> wrote: > On 4 November 2011 09:40, markus schnalke <mei...@marmaro.de> wrote: >> Someone already pointed it out. It actually were suckless projects >> that did intentionally not care about the meaning of version numbers. > > I agree. I don't even see why we don't just drop the first dot and > have dwm-60, dmenu-45.
I explained this already. I want to keep this version scheme just for the sake of conservatism. We don't need to change the versioning scheme every two years like others (I did it before dwm times quite often). But once a versioning scheme is in place, we stick to it. Cheers, Anselm
