On 11 Nov 2011 04:30, "Anselm R Garbe" <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 8 November 2011 07:28, Suraj N. Kurapati <sun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > And how is "modern" wmii different from its, let's say, "pre-modern" > > phase? From my view, it still uses the Plan9 protocol and the Plan9 > > approach of exposing a virtual filesystem for operation by the user. > > Yes, however wmii is cursed. Its code base has grown by factor 3 or 4 > in terms of SLOC, whereas its functionality has stalled. > >
Why is that, and how did that happen? -jf
