+----------------------- Dieter Plaetinck -----------+ > I don't understand... Are you saying "I agree the > token matching works fine and is the fastest, but I > still want you to implement an inferior and more > complicated approach (regexes)" ?
i don't want you to implement regexp, i'm quite happy with v4.3.1, i will even upgrade in the future and if you have some token matching implemented i will get used to it - have no fear. however for me regexp is not inferior to your token matching, it is more versatile and people are used to it - it is common. i'm just sceptical about this 'yet another matching scheme' ...
