On 28 November 2011 14:43, Christian Neukirchen <[email protected]> wrote:
> All supported except for -maxdepth, but you can use:
>
> find -L . -type d \! -name . -prune -o -type f -perm -111 -print
I've seen things like this before. All it does is prove how much find
needs replacing. I'm considering using stest (lstest?) to reduce
dmenu_run to something like:
> #!/bin/sh
> (
> IFS=:
> cache=${XDG_CACHE_HOME:-"$HOME/.cache"}
> if stest -dqr -n "$cache/dmenu_run" $PATH; then
> mkdir -p -m 0700 "$cache"
> stest -flx $PATH | sort -u | tee "$cache/dmenu_run" | dmenu "$@"
> else
> dmenu "$@" < "$cache/dmenu_run"
> fi
> ) | exec ${SHELL:-"/bin/sh"}
This seems far nicer, to me, than some find monstrosity.
cls
