On 02-08 09:39, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
rxvt-unicode uses the wonderful optimization of not really caring whether everything gets displayed.
I don't know if every one of those output lines is rendered on screen once. But it doesn't need to, since I can't read it anyways, no matetr if it takes 1, 3 or the 28 seconds takes here.
What's more important is that everything is in the scrollback, which always seems to be the case, even in rxvt.
(Although I consider this bad style. If you really need 10k lines and want to look at them, that's what less is for.)
So I don't see the problem with rxvt's way of things. Why not do it?
#define FONT "-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-*-*"
Using my shandard 12 doesn't change the behavior.It's not the font size, since width is ok, it's just the height is slightly less than in rxvt and I think dwm status bar, too.
--
ilf
Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg!
-- Eine Initiative des Bundesamtes für Tastaturbenutzung
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
