By bloated you mean the binary size is a miniscule; practically meaningless, amount larger than the others. That hardly counts as bloated. On Feb 9, 2012 7:59 PM, "Christian Neukirchen" <chneukirc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 9 February 2012 10:16, Hadrian Węgrzynowski <hadr...@hawski.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:15:52 +0100 > >> Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>>Btw. I would like you to use C and rc, not C and bash or something > >>>similar. > >> > >> There were once discussion about "blessed" rc version, but AFAIR there > >> were no simple conclusion. What version of rc is good enough? > >> What I remember: Byron's version is cursed and p9p version is too big. > >> So which one is good? > > > > Of course > > > > http://tools.suckless.org/9base > > This one is even more bloated than the others: > > text data bss dec hex filename > 77360 632 7496 85488 14df0 > /home/chris/src/rc-1.7.1/rc-static-musl > 81682 2088 6344 90114 16002 > /home/chris/src/rc-1.7.1/rc-dyn-glibc > 116849 3520 18272 138641 21d91 /opt/plan9/bin/rc-dyn-glibc > 154252 4480 20120 178852 2baa4 > /home/chris/src/9base/rc/rc-static-musl > 862556 8176 28824 899556 db9e4 > /home/chris/src/9base/rc/rc-static-glibc > > (Yes, the statically linked musl version is smaller than the dynamically > linked glibc version of the same program.) > -- > Christian Neukirchen <chneukirc...@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org > > >
