Whilst we're at it why don't we just always return 0, for better performance...
On 22 January 2013 22:08, Sam Watkins <s...@nipl.net> wrote: > anyway, I say stick with counting bytes, for better performance! >
Whilst we're at it why don't we just always return 0, for better performance...
On 22 January 2013 22:08, Sam Watkins <s...@nipl.net> wrote: > anyway, I say stick with counting bytes, for better performance! >