Raphaël Proust <raphla...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Christian Neukirchen > <chneukirc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Raphaël Proust <raphla...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Calvin Morrison >>> <mutanttur...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 29 March 2013 14:31, Nick <suckless-...@njw.me.uk> wrote: >>>>> […] >>>> >>>> While I find many of those features useless, some of them are plain >>>> cool, and are innovative. Why are we stuck with a text terminal when >>>> we aren't using a tty most of the time? Sure simple text modes should >>>> always be supported but additional features are cool. I'd love to be >>>> able do an easy ls and be able to see my picture previews, why not? >>>> It' s not terribly complicated and it sure is useful. >>> >>> >>> I also like the idea of not having a pure-text interaction with the >>> computer, but Terminology is definitely pushing things too far. It's >>> hard to have a good middle ground. >>> >>> Alternatively, you could set up plumber and have your terminal be as >>> smart as acme: left-click on a .jpg/png/gif/whatever opens an image >>> viewer. It separates the two concept (ls and preview) and is dead >>> simple. Bonus points: because the two concepts are separate, you can >>> have the plumbing rules independent of your terminal so you can set up >>> different dispatching easily. >> >> How does the plumber get hold of the current directory? > > As per previous emails in the conversation: it doesn't. > > Although plumb(1) has a `-w` option for that. So it would be really > simple to exec correctly from st's source.
st doesn't know either if one uses screen or tmux... I could live with fiddling it out of the title string, however. -- Christian Neukirchen <chneukirc...@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org