i haven't tried rebasing his code yet. but if i have time later this week i might try it. for fun.
--Carlos On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:23 AM, <random...@fastmail.us> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013, at 9:32, Carlos Torres wrote: >> I like the seperation of term.c from st.c, I agree that makes reading >> st.c clearer. I can't comment on the removal of forward declarations, >> typedefs and static vars though the resulting difference is legible as >> well. (frankly code in alphabetical order makes me want to sort it >> according to code flow and surrounding context...) i think the choice >> of using the fontconfig utf8 functions was a good idea. I frowned >> when you switched to 'gnu99' from 'c99' (i pictured a lot of flames on >> that) > > If it _can_ be compiled in c99 mode, no reason it shouldn't be - then > people can compile it using LLVM/clang, tendra, pcc, etc. > > How hard is it going to be to merge these changes with what changes have > been made to the main version since he branched off from it? >
