I believe it already has what you need to replace coreutils/busybox. though its not just a matter or swapping stuff. you'ld have to port all the shell scripts that depend on gnuish stuff. i.e. anything that uses the auto* stuff doesn't work with 9base awk and ls... but do you really need stuff that uses auto* cruft?
--Carlos On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Hugues <ypnose.yp...@mailoo.org> wrote: > Le 27-05-2013 02:48, Carlos Torres a écrit : > >> sbase and 9base are still used. i use 9base every day :). > > Ah, nice. It's awesome. > >> not much work goes into these since they don't >> aspire to having all the gnu options... what more do you need? > > Actually, I'm trying to find a coreutils/busybox alternative which suck > less, for a distro project. > That's why, I asked this question. I was wondering if it was abandoned/dead > or not. > About features, I don't think I need something new. > > Regards > -- > H MoV. >
