I really don't give a shit. The real question is why is FastCGI "suckless" approved. It's a pretty shitty and complicated protocol for what it does, especially when compared to SCGI.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Calvin Morrison <mutanttur...@gmail.com>wrote: > _who gives a shit_ > > For a site with 50 pages, fcgi is nothing. > > > > On 11 June 2013 11:59, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <w...@apgwoz.com> wrote: > > But how often does stuff actually get updated? You can simply pregenerate > > all the content and serve it... For a site with 50 pages, that's nothing. > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:36 AM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> For example because people didn't want to worry about having to update > >> stuff that gets included on multiple pages. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > http://apgwoz.com > > -- http://apgwoz.com