On 28 June 2013 20:11, oneofthem <oneoft...@lavabit.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:52:32AM +0800, Chris Down wrote: >> On 28 June 2013 10:28, oneofthem <oneoft...@lavabit.com> wrote: >> btpd seemed ok in terms of actual use when I last looked. I didn't >> look in great detail at the code, but I believe it does use openssl >> and autoconf, which kinda sucks. > > Whats wrong with openssl, what do you use if not openssl?
If you look at the attitude of the developers and the quality of the source code, it should become apparent why OpenSSL is a force for evil :-) As for what I suggest instead: http://libtom.org
