On 16/10/2013, Jochen Sprickerhof <[email protected]> wrote: > I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn > for testing and improving first versions.
Thanks! This was the last reason against my st adoption. On 16/10/2013, Christoph Lohmann <[email protected]> wrote: > You can add it as a patch to the wiki but it won’t be included in main‐ > line. Scrollback is what you have other applications for. Because next > you will want scrollback selection, scrollback editing and scrollback > history files. Other people solved these problems in software already. Yes: * Clearly xterm, rxvt, et al have done, but their lossage is the reason for st. * Terminal multiplexers have done, but suckless already has its own terminal multiplexer what hasn't: dwm.
