2013/10/24 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:35:03PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> Mihail Zenkov dixit: >> >> >It not mention good xml alternative: TOML >> >> Thank gods the time of Windows 3.x *.ini files is long gone. > > I'm confused as to what is wrong with the .ini style configurations. > They're not just used in Windows, they're used in many other places that > require simple, easy to use configurations. Python uses it, there are C > api's for it, etc. > > So what problem do you have with a .ini file? They are okay for simple config files. They are the opposite of okay for a markup language.
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML hiro
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Mihail Zenkov
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Alexander S.
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Thorsten Glaser
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML hiro
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Thorsten Glaser
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML koneu
- [OT] eMail (was Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML) Thorsten Glaser
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML hiro
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML William Giokas
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Alexander S.
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML William Giokas
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Mihail Zenkov
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Alexander S.
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Charlie Kester
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Alexander S.
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Bobby Powers
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Alexander S.
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Mihail Zenkov
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Samuel Holland
- Re: [dev] Some thoughts about XML Chris Down