So you're saying that this is better than Coffeescript? That comparison is completely unintelligible.If you're saying that we should step back and return to a simpler approach to web design/development - I completely agree, but how does a static site generator compare to Coffeescript/LESS/Jade at all? You could very well extend this to work with all of those technologies.
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Strake
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework sin
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framewor... Neo Romantique
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web fram... sin
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web fram... Neo Romantique
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Nicholas Hall
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Ryan O’Hara
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Nicholas Hall
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Ryan O’Hara
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Bryan Bennett
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Nicholas Hall
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Thorsten Glaser
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Nick
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Paul Onyschuk
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Edgaras
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framework Paul Onyschuk
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framewor... Edgaras
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web framewor... Thorsten Glaser
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web fram... Paul Onyschuk
- Re: [dev] wswsh: a mksh web fram... Thorsten Glaser