On 21 February 2014 07:21, Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 February 2014 18:27, koneu <kone...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Nick wrote: >>> Yes, but the web-viewer could suck less, internally. GTK & glib >>> being rather obvious examples. With that in mind I thought I'd take >>> another look at webkitnix today, and found that they're not planning >>> to maintain it anymore. Which sucks. >> >> Sad... I had hoped for uzbl to switch to it so I'd have a reason to >> leave behind dwb. >> Then again, Webkit itself sucks so badly that using GTK & glib won't >> really hurt surf. One could say that surf is a suckless interface to >> sucky GTK and sucky glib, which interface with C++ WebKit, which in turn >> interfaces with the World Wide Web of Suck. > > I'd say surf should be blink[0] based in the midterm future. I spend > some effort on checking how it can be statically linked. > > Granted, it might suck a whole lot more than webkitgtk, but I see the > days come, when webkitgtk(+) will fall behind. > > The web game isn't suckless. It is suckmore.
[0] http://www.chromium.org/blink -Anselm
