On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 09:07:10PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote: > I can see the need for a '-d' flag for compatibility reasons but my > preference would be to just ignore the flag if it is specified. What are > peoples opinion on the '-d' flag?
One thing that is different is the breaking conditions for when to consider the invocation as invalid usage (in the -d case we check for >= 2 in any other case we check for != 2). So in that case we cannot consider -d as a no-op as far as I uderstand it. We can still share the rest of the code though.
