>>>>> "REVC" == Roberto E Vargas Caballero <k...@shike2.com> writes:

    >> if default color is used (with light background and black
    >> foreground it's looking rather ugly, brightened black font
    >> becomes gray and unreadable on light gray background).

    REVC>> If you don't like you can always change the background.

Quite the opposite, I like my background color and I don't want to
change it.

Bold colors are brightened to stand out even more. But with the light
background and dark foreground brightening acts contrary making the
letters less emphasized.

    >> Please consider adopting standard behavior, otherwise it's making
    >> the bold text hard to read on a gray background ;-)

    REVC>> standard? could you explain what standard are you talking?,
    REVC>> because I think no iso, or ansi, or whenever you want made a
    REVC>> standard about it.

Don't jeer, believe you understood that I mean de-facto standards
(xterm, rxvt, gnome terminals based on libvte, etc.). Every terminal
which I tried behaves consistently (doesn't brighten implicit default
foreground with bold face). You may try yourself escape sequences which
I provided.

I'm sorry for disturbing you, I thought my observation would be
useful. I was wrong.

-- 
Concordia salus.

Reply via email to