>>>>> "REVC" == Roberto E Vargas Caballero <k...@shike2.com> writes:
>> if default color is used (with light background and black >> foreground it's looking rather ugly, brightened black font >> becomes gray and unreadable on light gray background). REVC>> If you don't like you can always change the background. Quite the opposite, I like my background color and I don't want to change it. Bold colors are brightened to stand out even more. But with the light background and dark foreground brightening acts contrary making the letters less emphasized. >> Please consider adopting standard behavior, otherwise it's making >> the bold text hard to read on a gray background ;-) REVC>> standard? could you explain what standard are you talking?, REVC>> because I think no iso, or ansi, or whenever you want made a REVC>> standard about it. Don't jeer, believe you understood that I mean de-facto standards (xterm, rxvt, gnome terminals based on libvte, etc.). Every terminal which I tried behaves consistently (doesn't brighten implicit default foreground with bold face). You may try yourself escape sequences which I provided. I'm sorry for disturbing you, I thought my observation would be useful. I was wrong. -- Concordia salus.