> Yeah. ^[[6m=>Fast blink isn't even on the (now) canonical reference > http://invisible-island.net/xterm/ctlseqs/ctlseqs.html
We use http://www.vt100.net/ as canonical reference. > I'm not really that enamored with the fastblink patch either, but I felt the > main loop needed to suck less. Not sure if it does with this patch, but, > well, it's at least a conversation piece. I totally agree with you. The main loop is one of the aspect of st that need more work. Regards, -- Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
