On 20/11/2014, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:53:12 -0500 > M Farkas-Dyck <strake...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> OpenBSD has poor multiprocessing performance but Bitrig is working on it. > > You can buy yourself performance by buying faster Hardware, but you > can't buy yourself security. > That's why choosing security is always better than choosing speed.
I ought to rather note that OpenBSD has cumbersome synchronization mechanisms which also happen to be inefficient, and Bitrig is moving to simpler synchronization mechanisms. For example: critical sections rather than interrupt priority levels. On 20/11/2014, Louis Santillan <lpsan...@gmail.com> wrote: > systemd bus Ah, I see what you did there ☺
