Greetings.

On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:00:01 +0100 Martti Kühne <mysat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Reading what hiro had to say about the topic makes it sound as if we
> just needed a wiki "pastebin" section that has built-in "archiving"
> (git rm) feature that builds on git's built-in feature of preserving
> history.
> Maybe we could write clients that don't give a shit whether such an
> entry was archived and BAM - problem solved?

Yes,  that’s  a good proposal. Then all available Unix tools can be used
to sort, find duplicates and make some order. Maybe it could be  a  dif‐
ferent  git repository to avoid overlapping merges. There could be still
discussions on hackers@ about pastes. A web  interface  could    satisfy
the hipsters fraction and Google.
By  having  a  separate repository it could run without moderation. Only
a file limit restriction would be needed. If things go wrong, remove the
repository.  By  still  sending changes to hackers@ we have some control
over abuse.

The  problem  here is a bit the Wikipedia problem: I would like to setup
my own Wikipedia mirror but PHP and some ugly SQL backend are keeping me
away  from  it. There is no sane data export available but SQL dumps. If
Wikipedia would be some public git repository it would be easier to have
overlays by using something like the unionfs and running the common wiki
web interface on top of this new directory. That seems easier than  hav‐
ing  some  SQL  database  doing  an inefficient sync every month. And it
doesn’t add the PHP dependency. This problem adheres to the web and  its
cruft we need to solve.

Everything should be a git repository nowadays? Hammer time!

Btw.,  I like the IoB (Internet of Bunkers) idea: BaaS (Bunker as a Ser‐
vice)


Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann

"We must make a distinction between the enemy and ourselves, and we must
not adopt an antagonistic stand towards comrades and treat  them  as  we
would  the enemy. In speaking up, one must have an ardent desire to pro‐
tect the cause of the people and raise  their  political  consciousness,
and there must be no ridiculing or attacking in one’s approach."
     ‐‐Mao Tse Tung (Ibid. p. 20.*)


Reply via email to