On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:40:07AM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:55:45 +0100 > Markus Teich <markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de> wrote: > > Hey Markus, > > > This is an interesting idea. I would not use it for mainline (users don't > > want > > to change their password in many places), but you can push a patch to the > > wiki. > > Dimitris talked about a "third" way to handle passwords on a system, and we > discussed plans on porting ubase to this new "platform", however, I forgot > how it was called. > It could be a way to simplify the slock code though, from what I remember.
http://www.openwall.com/tcb/ this is however outside the control of slock, there is no porting that needs to be done for ubase to take advantage of this. this is a system issue, assuming the system is configured to use tcb and the libc supports it then all programs get it for free.
