On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:31:34 -0400 Johnathan McKnight <akoime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Mattias Andrée > <maand...@kth.se> wrote: > > > > In any case both SYSLINUX and LILO only supports > > x86. I don't know if that is only the bootmanager > > or the bootloader too, we need good ones that > > support more architectures. Too bad I only have > > x86 (well, lucky too I guess). Basically, all > > bootmanager are good, you do not have enough > > from to make them bloated, and their mission > > is limited, so for a good bootmanager you could > > just pick any. So one should try to write a > > portable bootloader that is suckless. > > > Only x86? What about the efi version for 64bit: > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=Install#UEFI > > Or is this just strictly the non-efi version we're > talking about? I'll have to look it over again... > x86 is often an umbrella term for 32-bit and 64-bit (x86_64). But I was just going of what Wikipedia listed. However, if you support 32-bit than you automatically support 64-bit.
pgp589I7isagK.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature