Hi, Kamil Cholewiński wrote: > Compiler-level seatbelts are too good not to have! That's how I'd see > THE candidate to replace C: safe by default, full control only when you > need it. Add: actually simple (looking at you, Go, Rust), and we'd > finally have a worthy contender.
Go is a _much_ simpler language than C. Go specification: https://golang.org/ref/spec C specification: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf The _implementation_ of Go is less simple, as it includes a userspace scheduler and low-latency GC, but I don't know how you would expect to add seatbelts to C or assembly and not increase _eiter_ the language _or_ implementation complexity. yours, Bobby
