On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:24:00AM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, David Phillips <dbphillip...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Some people thought it was a good idea to use 6.1 to denote git head before > > 6.1 actually came out. This worked fine until they stopped maintaining > > their patches to apply against git head. > > > > Something should be done about the patches that no longer apply cleanly, > > however. > > Keep the "supported" patches as commits on separate branches in the > official git repo? > > - Pretty obvious which commit is the patch derived from, +1 > - Quite easy to rebase a patch to latest master, +1 > - Are git branches considered suckless though? :) > > K. >
What? Since when were any patches "supported"?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
