Hi,

I also keep a patched version of dwm at github.com/jceb/dwm-patches that
stacks all the patches in order to smoothly apply them.  This is also
how I develop my patch using quilt.

Unfortunately, it's extremely hard to port interwoven patches back to
mainline.  I have some tooling at github.com/jceb/dwm-clean-patches that
reduces the pain to the bare minimum but even this is a lot of pain and
time.

Personally, I'd recommend newbies that want to use a patched version to
find someone who's maintaining a "fork".  Maybe these "forks" could be
listed in the patches section of the wiki.  What do you think?

Jan Christoph

PS: I'll update my share of patches in the next 1-2 weeks to the current
HEAD.

On Sat 23-07-2016 17:21 +0200, FRIGN wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:54:36 -0800 Britton Kerin
> <britton.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Britton,
>
> > dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
> > couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a
> > pre-rolled version of dwm might be useful instead:
>
> you really raise a valid point, fortunately, as you may know, there
> are proceedings to clean up the wiki and the progress is already
> pretty good.  It's a difficult matter because patches interfere. I
> know of no way to make multiple patches inclusive to each other, in
> many cases it is not possible.  There are some things thought that I'd
> like to see in mainline, e.g.  removing borders of the window when
> there's only one window in the current tag.
>
> Cheers
>
> FRIGN
>

--
Jan Christoph Ebersbach
I didn’t want some petty, inferior brand of righteousness that comes
from keeping a list of rules when I could get the robust kind that comes
from trusting Christ - God’s righteousness.  Phil 3:9

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to