On 09/06/16 22:07, Evan Gates wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Thomas Levine <_...@thomaslevine.com> wrote: >> Adherence to standards and legibility can be problematic if you care >> about >> portability to sucky systems and shells. For example, `...` is more >> widely >> supported than $(...). But in the case of stali, I suggest that non-suck >> should >> take priority over portability. > I think shell scripts should adhere to the POSIX sh standard. Trying > to support older shells such as bourne is pointless. If the shell > doesn't support POSIX sh then we shouldn't care about it. > It is indeed, read my previuos answer.
- [dev] Shell style guide Evan Gates
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide S. Gilles
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Evan Gates
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Ali H. Fardan
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Evan Gates
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide hiro
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Evan Gates
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide hiro
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Thomas Levine
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Evan Gates
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Antenore Gatta
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Greg Reagle
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Adrian Grigore
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Evan Gates
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Greg Reagle
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Antenore Gatta
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Adrian Grigore
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Charlie Kester
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Adrian Grigore
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Evan Gates
- Re: [dev] Shell style guide Adrian Grigore