On Oct 7, 2016 7:24 AM, "Bruno Vetter" <simplelife2...@outlook.com> wrote: > yes, it's tedious and I understand that it's not crucial to have the > toolchain statically linked. Trying to do so also brings up a lot of > questions that I cannot answer easily. For example a statically linked linker > apparently does not support an lto plugin. I have no idea if that would be > acceptable for a toolchain. > > I might just go on with the existing toolchain as you describe. Thanks much > for your help.
What "header file not found" issue did you hit with musl-cross-make? I've used it successfully to build a native statically-linked toolchain, although I ran into and worked around a couple of issues. If you like, I have uploaded a pre-built toolchain[0] for my own project. Yes, I believe LTO doesn't work with a statically-linked gcc/binutils. [0] https://github.com/michaelforney/oasis-toolchain
