On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:48:35AM +0800, Pickfire wrote: > Kamil Cholewiński <harry6...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I think it might have been possible to use some other build tool to > > > achieve something similar, but I don't think it would have worked out > > > as well. > > > > http://gittup.org/tup/ ? > > I did a benchmark against tup, make, mk, ninja back then. > What I learn: > > - make is the fastest > - ninja needs to be run twice > - tup is slowest (probably didn't use monitor) but easy to write > - mk is slightly slower than make
ninja claims to be "as fast as possible" but starts shell instead of executing programs directly like make does.
