On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Laslo Hunhold wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:12:45 +0200 > Hiltjo Posthuma <hil...@codemadness.org> wrote: > > Hey Hiltjo, > > > Maybe we should only allow SSH for private repos and git:// for the > > public ones (sites). This is also more efficient. > > > > What do you think? > > I assume you mean that we only allow git:// for read-only cloning of > the repos and ssh:// for push-access. In this case, I'd agree with you! > The git://-protocol is much more efficient than cloning via http://, > however, to keep the perspective complete, some firewalls block git://. > This is a minor issue in my opinion, though. > > Before we do that, we will have to change all the links on suckless.org > accordingly.
How would anonymous pushing to the sites repository keep working? - ~ parazyd GnuPG: 03337671FDE75BB6A85EC91FB876CB44FA1B0274 GnuPG: https://parazyd.cf/FA1B0274.asc
