On 2019-11-03, Silvan Jegen <s.je...@gmail.com> wrote: > I assume it's the leading whitespace that was the problem since here[0] > the output format is given as > > "%d %d %d %s\n", <newlines>, <words>, <bytes>, <file> > > > Considering this and that [0] doesn't mention anything about alignment, > just having "%zu %zu %zu %s\n" as before seems like the right choice.
Okay, that sounds good to me, and nobody else expressed an opinion, so I made this change. Thanks for your input!
