You Guys can, checkout the suckless sites repo git://git.suckless.org/sites and submit your own preferred changes for review.
--Carlos On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:00 AM Kyryl Melekhin <k.melek...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Mart Zirnask <martzirn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I will definitely try out neatvi, but shouldn't you mention somewhere > > in your readme that it is a fork of Ali Gohlami Rudi's neatvi? [1] His > > other framebuffer applications [2] would probably also deserve a place > > in the 'rocks' listing. > > True, it does not mention that it's from Ali, > I thought it was common knowledge, but he is credited in the > source code comment. I'll credit him in the readme also if it > bothers you so much. Although the amount of effort I put into the fork > is probably equal to what Ali made, so there is a reason why I posted > my version. So try the stock version, see what features are missing for > your needs, then try mine, do a diff and patch if I have the features > you may need, and have your own custom fork. Keep in mind though that > I made my neatvi a general purpose editor that I use for everything now, > I comletely got rid of VIM from my system, which is considered harmful. > So ideally my wish is to make people do the same. Many people use dwm and > st and it grew to have many good patches and infinite user control. So > why can't we have the same good things for a text editor? I tried all > text editors listed on the rocks page and all of them were not suitable > for hacking in some way, just like how easy it is to hack on st or dwm > for example. But neatvi came in as a saving hero. > > I wouldn't mind also adding other Ali's apps on the rocks page. > > Regards, >