On 22/08/01 09:30, Quentin Rameau wrote: > Andrew has posted a patch (on hackers@ on may first) for this > that nobody had time to review yet. :/ > I suggest you try it, that should fix your issue.
Ah, I'm not subscribed on that list (yet?). Anyway, I tested my patch on my use case and it behaves correctly so far, so I leave you guys to decide whether to review/include it or not. In the meantime, I have posted another patch, which adds a -n option (equivalent of --no-recursion) for your consideration.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
