On 23/01/14 09:25, Markus Wichmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 07:53:41PM -0600, Dave Blanchard wrote: > > I experimented with st for a week or so, before finally realizing that > > it's poorly-written trash. It has no advantages over XTerm at all. > > > > So where's the patch? > > Given that a terminal emulator is a necessary part of the Trusted > Computing Base if the system has X11, I'd prefer it to be as simple as > possible, so that it is not exploitable. st is simple enough to be able > to roughly gauge whether it has memory bugs or not. XTerm is such > overwritten tripe I cannot gauge that at all. > > Ciao, > Markus
Obvious trolling should receive no response. This kind of noise belongs to Reddit and similar communities, where it is commonplace. Most of what's to be said in "defense" of st and other suckless software is already out there on suckless.org, including the sorry state of XTerm being the driving idea behind writing st, which the OP turned upside-down, so that's one more reason against responding, and enough to see it's trolling.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
