Elie Le Vaillant <eolie...@disroot.org> wrote: > Another idea could be to have both in the same git repository, > [...]
This would be my idea as well. It also wouldn't be that difficult to let people pick and choose which sets of tools to include in the final -box via config.mk or similar. I would stick with only the high-level sets and leave the omission of individual tools up to the "user" (I already do this because I prefer a few tools from OpenBSD even when using Linux). > Also I'm not sure whether we should keep the goal of being POSIX-compliant. I also agree with this. POSIX, like everything designed by committees, is full of bad and/or incomplete ideas. I think that having a set of tools that isn't GNU/spaghetti but still supports some of the good non-POSIX options (for example sponge, xargs -P, working tar, etc.) would be nice to have. - Randy -- https://rnpnr.xyz/ GPG Fingerprint: B8F0 CF4C B6E9 415C 1B27 A8C4 C8D2 F782 86DF 2DC5
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
