On 24/03/08 06:40AM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: > I would like to move the discussion here and see what alternatives > we have and how to proceed in this case.
IMHO, if the intention behind sbase was to provide a minimal portable POSIX utilities implementation, anything not fitting that definition should be moved out of sbase. A separate project, perhaps called [insert_letter]base, could cover the utilities not in POSIX which are common in Unix-like systems. The problem of having separate *box executables could be solved by creating an "umbrella" *box project, perhaps having sbase, ubase and [insert_letter]base as git submodules, and deciding what to build based on the contents of config.mk.
