UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ +1
-----Original Message----- From: Ville Brofeldt <ville.v.brofe...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 9:57 AM To: dev@superset.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][SIP-78] Proposal for Advanced Types EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION / COURRIEL EXTERNE - FAITES PREUVE DE PRUDENCE +1 (binding) I think this is a great feature and will help make Superset more approachable for domain experts (networking in the examples raised in the SIP). I'm sure other use cases will come up as the functionality is made available to the broader Superset community. Ville > On 11. Apr 2022, at 16.26, Ryan Stubbert <ry.stubb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, This is a call to vote on SIP-78, a proposal to add advanced > types to superset. This feature will allow columns in a dataset to be > tagged with an `Advanced Type` which will define the display value of > the data in charts, user input validation on filters, tailored > operator lists (for filters) as well as custom query behaviour. > > More details and discussion can be found on GitHub: > https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith > ub.com%2Fapache%2Fsuperset%2Fissues%2F17852&data=04%7C01%7CMelanie > .Rouette%40cyber.gc.ca%7Cea25506409534c875c3608da1bc31742%7Cda9cbe40ec > 1e4997afb317d87574571a%7C1%7C0%7C637852821966992879%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG > Zsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0% > 3D%7C3000&sdata=Umz0K1pQuL4jAbYVdH29phayx7X%2BSGc3U0VBHbLOXIk%3D&a > mp;reserved=0 > > Some proof of concept work can be seen > here:https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fsuperset%2Fpull%2F18794&data=04%7C01%7CMela > nie.Rouette%40cyber.gc.ca%7Cea25506409534c875c3608da1bc31742%7Cda9cbe4 > 0ec1e4997afb317d87574571a%7C1%7C0%7C637852821966992879%7CUnknown%7CTWF > pbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6M > n0%3D%7C3000&sdata=ISBwO8aOwJdjMm3ZHOr9VvH8p1%2BjDiJ6x4Wgd81r2IU%3 > D&reserved=0 > > The vote will be open for 1 week. > > Please vote accordingly: [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 > disapprove with the reason, thank you!