That’s a good point Mads. Let’s also include changing the vote email template to guarantee at least 72 hours for voting as part of this lazy consensus proposal.
Best regards, Michael S. Molina > On 12 Apr 2024, at 10:31, Mads Toftum <m...@toftum.dk> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:52:09AM -0300, Michael S. Molina wrote: >> The Release Management group discussed some changes to our Release Process >> <https://github.com/apache/superset/wiki/Release-Process> to further improve >> our releases. I’m seeking lazy consensus for the proposed changes outlined >> here <https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions/27769>. >> >> Feel free to discuss, and if nobody objects to this idea, we’ll update our >> Wiki page and adhere to the new rules. >> > One thing that I noticed on the last release vote was that it said > something like "runs for 72 hours or until 3 +1s" - the last release > ended being up for a vote for a lot less than 72 hours. However the > voting guidelines - https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > states: > > "Voting periods should generally run for at least 72 hours to > provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate, > regardless of their geographic location" > > Perhaps it would be worth also modifying the release process to be > in line with that? > > vh > > Mads Toftum > -- > http://flickr.com/photos/q42/
