+1 (binding) That's a nice SIP! I appreciate all the thought that's gone into this. I love that in adding LLMs now, it can be integrated via MCP & extensions vs. if we had bolted them on a year ago before those things existed.
Sam On Mon, Oct 13, 2025, at 8:05 PM, Michael S. Molina wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Best regards, > Michael S. Molina > > > On 13 Oct 2025, at 21:04, Ville Brofeldt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 binding! > > > > Ville > > > >> On Oct 13, 2025, at 4:40 PM, Evan Rusackas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 binding!!! > >> > >>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025, 4:01 PM Cubensio Mimidensio <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (non binding) > >>> ________________________________ > >>> De: Maxime Beauchemin <[email protected]> > >>> Enviado: lunes, 13 de octubre de 2025 10:23 a. m. > >>> Para: [email protected] <[email protected]> > >>> Asunto: [VOTE] Proposal for Model Context Protocol (MCP) Service [SIP-187] > >>> > >>> Hey everyone! > >>> > >>> The future is here. I'm calling for a vote for *SIP-187* > >>> > >>> Hats off for all the architecture design and work that is actively taking > >>> place, led by *Amin Ghadersohi*, and thanks to all the support and early > >>> reviewing from *Daniel Gaspar. *Thanks to everyone who contributed and > >>> helped push this forward over the past few months. > >>> > >>> Note: the code related to this SIP has already largely been written, and > >>> can be found in the form of a collection of PRs that are already actively > >>> being reviewed, but held up by this vote. Also note that a lot of great > >>> refactoring / prep work to support landing this SIP has already been > >>> merged > >>> to the repo. Notably great improvements around the DAOs and Commands > >>> abstractions that will support existing work + this new SIP. > >>> > >>> Main PR: https://github.com/apache/superset/pull/33976 > >>> > >>> See the proposal and discussion here: > >>> https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/35498 > >>> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number > >>> of votes are reached. > >>> > >>> Please vote accordingly: > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 approve > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > >>> > > >
