Thanks everyone for the great discussion during the Extensions meeting, which available on Superset's calendar if anyone wants to join 😉
I added a comment to the SIP with the results of the meeting. +1 (binding) Great work Beto! Best regards, Michael S. Molina > On 4 Feb 2026, at 17:13, Evan Rusackas <[email protected]> wrote: > >  > Semantic layer Extensions!? Sign me up! Left a comment, but I think this is > all going in the correct direction for Superset’s future. > > +1, binding. >> On Feb 4, 2026 at 11:42 AM -0800, [email protected], wrote: >> Edited to add: >> >>> In this work, new semantic layers will be added as extensions, >>> following the design from [SIP-151] The vision for a new Superset >>> Plugins Architecture #31932. >> >>> On 2026-02-04 06:46, Michael S. Molina wrote: >>> Thanks for the SIP Beto. I left a comment in the SIP during the >>> discussion phase asking if it’s possible to update the description >>> with the results of our discussion with the Extensions group. Could >>> you address this comment? I will wait for the updated version to cast >>> my vote. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Michael S. Molina >>> >>>> On 4 Feb 2026, at 07:32, Mehmet Salih Yavuz <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> >>>> **Mehmet Salih Yavuz** >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> On Monday, 02/02/26 at 20:33 [email protected] wrote: >>>> Hi, folks! >>>> >>>> I'd like to call for a vote on SIP-182, "Semantic Layer Support in >>>> Apache Superset": >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/35003 >>>> >>>> Semantic layers will be implemented as extensions, as agreed on the >>>> discussion about the SIP. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> --Beto >>>>
