Thanks, John for the reply. I am wondering, shouldn't be it's great if *Superset follows multiple requirements.txt files*. One with only mandatory packages and one combined with optional packages as well along with mandatory one.
*Why I am asking*? I am a maintainer of docker-superset <https://github.com/abhioncbr/docker-superset> and want to continue with Superset Docker Image with all features including optional one which can be easily used for exploration purpose to deployment at production scale. It would be easier for me to maintain if I have the second complete requirements.txt file. Looking forward to discussing further on this. Thanks Abhishek PS: Wrote an article on my idea of running Superset in the production <https://medium.com/@abhioncbr/apache-superset-in-the-production-environment-92e914102cc5> environment. On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 9:14 PM John Bodley <john.bod...@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi, > > Per the update > < > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/master/UPDATING.md#superset-0310 > > > since > 0.31.0 Celery flower is optional and thus you will need to manually install > it in your environment. We've marked a number of non-required packages as > optional. > > -John > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 4:19 PM Abhishek Sharma < > abhioncbr.apa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for releasing a new version of Superset. > > While using the latest version of Superset, I realized flower dependency > is > > not there. It is a good package for monitoring Celery. Is it dropped > > purposely? > > > > Also, please add me as a contributor for Superset Jira. My Jira id is > > *abhioncbr* > > > > Thanks > > Abhishek > > >
