I think the risk is very small and is largely compensated by the fact
that I did a whole bunch of bug fixes in Axiom.

Andreas

2009/4/20 kimhorn <[email protected]>:
>
> That great Andreas,
> I will test it out.
>
> Do you think using 1.2.9 with Synapse Snapshot and 1.3 could be a risk
> and result in other incompatabilities ?
>
> Thanks so much
> Kim
>
>
>
> Andreas Veithen-2 wrote:
>>
>> Update: WSCOMMONS-461 is now implemented. See [1] for instructions on
>> how to use this feature.
>>
>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~veithen/synapse/faq.html#cdata
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 02:34, kimhorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thanks again for that. You saved me some time experimenting.
>>> I will look at Jira 280 etc; and wait for 1.2.9.
>>> Did you mean a Synapse snapshot ?
>>>
>>> Kim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Andreas Veithen-2 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think the primary issue is SYNAPSE-280. There are three
>>>> solutions/workarounds for this issue:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Modify Synapse as described in the JIRA issue (only works for
>>>> standalone deployments).
>>>> 2. Make CDATA processing configurable at the Axiom level, as described
>>>> in WSCOMMONS-461. This will only be ready for 1.2.9, but you can use a
>>>> snapshot version. Since this is a change to a single class, we could
>>>> also prepare a patch with this.
>>>> 3. Simply upgrade Woodstox to 4.0.x, because in that version the XML
>>>> parser is non coalescing by default (as required by the specs) and
>>>> reports CDATA sections.
>>>>
>>>> As mentioned in SYNAPSE-280, there could be issues because of code in
>>>> Axis2 or Synapse that implicitly assumes that the parser is
>>>> coalescing. If this problem arises, there is a workaround: by
>>>> carefully setting the properties on the Woodstox parser, one can
>>>> configure it to coalesce text nodes and CDATA sections separately
>>>> (i.e. without merging text nodes and CDATA sections as in the real
>>>> coalescing mode).
>>>>
>>>> There is also another thing that could become an issue under some
>>>> circumstances: when sending several consecutive CDATA events to a
>>>> XMLStreamWriter, it will write them as distinct CDATA sections. This
>>>> makes sense but it is a limitation when there is a need to wrap a very
>>>> long text in a single CDATA section.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not aware of any other issues related to CDATA sections.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 23:09, kimhorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, i'l try that. There was a lot of issues around CDATA, in the
>>>>> past,
>>>>> and I was wondering if Synapse (Axis, Axiom..) handles them before
>>>>> experimenting further ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andreas Veithen-2 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the Javascript the problem ?
>>>>>>> Note it is impossible to insert the CDATA in the Javascript as then
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Javscript become invalid due to the nested CDATA. Hence why I used
>>>>>>> Java.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see 3 possible ways to achieve this (assuming that the XML scripting
>>>>>> supports CDATA sections, which needs to be confirmed):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * I think scripts can be loaded from registry entries and that plain
>>>>>> text files are supported by the registry. In that case there is no
>>>>>> problem with escaping.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Instead of escaping the JavaScript using a CDATA section, use
>>>>>> entities, i.e. replace all < by &lt;:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> &lt;ws1:claimData>&lt;![CDATA["{claimData}"]]>&lt;/ws1:claimData>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Escape the JavaScript using a CDATA section, except for the embedded
>>>>>> ]]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <![CDATA[
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> <ws1:claimData><![CDATA["{claimData}"]]>]]><![CDATA[</ws1:claimData>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> ]]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alternatively, if you want something (slightly) more readable:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <![CDATA[
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> <ws1:claimData>]]>&lt;![CDATA["{claimData}"]]><![CDATA[</ws1:claimData>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> ]]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Does-CData-work---tp23052352p23067194.html
>>>>> Sent from the Synapse - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Does-CData-work---tp23052352p23088563.html
>>> Sent from the Synapse - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Does-CData-work---tp23052352p23128036.html
> Sent from the Synapse - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to