Thanks Eirc, it seems like this dependency causes some issues for the JDK-1.5 build. If that is qpid and mina both are not direct dependencies of synapse, I would remove the slf4j and let any one who wants the above two scenarios working add it with there own.
Thanks, Ruwan On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Hubert, Eric <eric.hub...@foxmobile.com>wrote: > Hi Ruwan, > > I think we already had this topic in April. ;-) At that time we identified > qpid and mina, if I'm not wrong. Mina was only used by Quickfix/J... > > But here a mail I pulled of my mail archive: > > ------------- Mail from Ruwan Sa 04.04.2009 14:26 --------------- > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Andreas Veithen <andreas.veit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 13:50, Ruwan Linton <ruwan.lin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka < > hiranya...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> I believe slf4j is required only for the FIX transport. It is a MINA > >> dependency which is used by Quickfix/J. If it is not used by anything > else > >> we should remove this. > > > > Good point, Asankha, are we going to ship the QFJ jar files, I think we > have > > decided to remove these and document this under the fix transport > > configuration for the user to put in these dependencies upon configuring > it, > > right?? > > > This JAR only takes 9 KB. I would just leave it in the distribution. > The advantage is that whenever a user adds a library that uses the > SLF4J framework, logging will correctly work out of the box without > the need for the user to understand the relationship between log4j, > SLF4J and commons-logging. > > I am completely OK with keeping this, but not QuickFixJ and other related > dependencies, because FIX is a domain specific transport which wont be > required for many users. > > Ruwan > > ________________________________________ > From: Ruwan Linton [mailto:ruwan.lin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:45 AM > To: dev@synapse.apache.org > Subject: SLF4J dependency?? > > Does any body know why we have slf4j libraries on the lib directory of the > synapse distribution? That was the reason for the JDK1.5 failure of the > build :-(, I just want to make sure there is no code using slf4j directly > before getting rid of them :-) > -- Ruwan Linton Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org email: ru...@wso2.com; cell: +94 77 341 3097 blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com
