On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:22 PM, indika kumara <indika.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just another personal thought. Supporting parametrization as a first class > capability. I found XSLT 'template' and 'xsl:with-param' very interesting. > Endpoint definition, sequence definition, proxy definition. etc are kinds of > templates and not the concrete ones. Calling such a template, the > corresponding language construct is created. > > E.g. > > <endpoint name="foo"> > details ( There may be a URl or not) > </endpoint> > > Creating an endpoint > > <endpoint name="foo"/> > <param name="url">value</param> // this is optional. > </endpoint> > > URI is just one thing. I am seeing an opportunity for a maximum reuse of > all language constructs. The use of the template concept is very popular in > many languages. > > BTW, I have not validated what I had said. All things are just based on my > intuition. So, these ideas may seem nonsense. if so, I am extremely sorry. >
Hi Indika, I also feel supporting parametrization as a first class thing will be a very powerful feature. But I didn't get what you meant completely. Could you please explain a bit more? Thanks, Supun.. > Thanks, > > Indika > -- Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc http://wso2.org supunk.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@synapse.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@synapse.apache.org
